May
30, 2000
One
of my favourite things to do each morning (along with tea)
is to read all the journals i've discovered. In
fact, it usually fills more time than i should be taking;
time that is supposed to be spent working. But i
like indulging myself!
Anyway, during a tour of the Bloodstone webring the other
day, i came across shimmer's
latest entry and after requesting permission from her, i
responded to some things she had said. i couldn't
resist the impulse, especially since she had so kindly
provided me with some great ideas to think about!
shimmer wrote: "Yes, i do believe that i am
deeply submissive ... i get scared of my motivations.
What if i find Him one day ... and He looks inside my soul
and says ..."you aren't in this for Me, you are in
this for you" ... and walks away? And what if He's
right?"
i would hope that He is
right. i cant help but feel that a submissive is
"in it" for him/herself. Why else would
they be? Isn't the journey about answering a call
inside one's psyche that is so strong it can't be
ignored? Isn't it about fulfilling a personal
need? Even if that need is to be at someone's feet,
then isn't it all about "me"?
Yet in turn, by answering the need
inside oneself, by finding the person that deserves to
have your submissive personality sitting at their feet,
then their needs are being met as well. So perhaps
it is reasonable to assume that the Dominant is "in
this" for Him/Herself too. This would then
become a mutual selfishness. A shared
selfishness.
If either party is
participating in this lifestyle because they think they
"should" or "must" or "have
to" for another, then i question their
reasoning. If it is because they are trying to
please someone else, without regard to their own
personality, then i can't believe that this is a healthy
relationship. i would suggest that a Dominant
understand that a submissive is "in
this" for themselves, yet also for
their Master/Mistress. Equally important, the
said Dominant should also understand that He/She is
"in this" for their own dominant
needs as well.
If my Master said to me;
" you aren't in this for Me, you are in this for
you" i would agree wholeheartedly. i would also
say the same sentence back to Him. And in reverse,
if He said; "you are in this for Me, you
aren't in this for you", again i would agree.
And again, repeat the same sentence back to Him. i
believe it should work both ways. i believe i should
fill my needs and His, and i have the expectation
of Him receiving/giving the same.
shimmer wrote: "Perhaps i just haven't been in
a serious relationship that i truly can't control yet. i
need it. i crave it. i seek it."
Mutual control. That's
the way it seems to me that it should work. Yes, i
gave Him my control, and yes He uses it as He deems
appropriate. But i still maintain control in the
giving. i chose to give it, the control
wasn't taken. Therefore we are equal. Perhaps
what might be more important is the Dominant knowing what
to do with the control He's been presented with.
It's about fit. About
submission fitting Dominance, Dominance fitting
submission. A circle.
Just some early morning ideas. Maybe a rant?
Okay, okay. i'll put away the soapbox. Heh!
|